|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Today Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is a household name for most investors, and the company's products are used by nearly 1 billion consumers worldwide. But in March 1986, when the company first listed its stock, the world's largest software developer was a relative unknown. But investors with the prescience to jump into Microsoft's IPO were amply rewarded -- through the end of 2000, Microsoft returned more than +60,000%, enough to turn a $5,000 investment into more than $3 million. And even if you were late to the party, Microsoft was still a millionaire-maker -- returning a total of +3,800% between 1992 and 2000. Not surprisingly, the goal of every investor is to identify the next Microsoft. Everyone would love to grab the next firm that will come to dominate a market and produce phenomenal gains in a matter of a few years. Unfortunately, that's easier said than done -- there's no single characteristic or quality that divides great companies from your average, run-of-the-mill firm. If identifying the next Microsoft were as easy as running as simple screen, everyone would be doing it. But all is not lost; the companies behind the best-performing stocks in history have frequently shared a few basic characteristics such as a strong, defensible competitive advantage and high profit margins. Microsoft, for example, has several important competitive advantages. First, the company's major programs, including its Windows operating system and Office suite of software, are dominant in their markets. Office and Windows are both used by about 90% of all computer users worldwide. Even as a number of competitors have emerged over the years, Microsoft has maintained its dominance. One major reason is that consumers have been trained to use Microsoft products and are familiar with the software; switching to a new program would require learning a new operating system or word processor program. In addition, consumers use Microsoft products because other consumers use the same program -- what's often called a "network effect." In other words, if you need to e-mail a file to someone, you want to send it in a format that is widely used. Because more than 90% of consumers globally use Microsoft's Word and Excel programs, these have become the de-facto standards -- it can be tough to convert files from Word to another word processing program. Therefore, most users simply use Word, Excel and other Microsoft products in order to avoid this problem. The beauty of this network effect is that as Microsoft's base of users becomes larger, this advantage continues to grow. The second characteristic of many great companies is high profit margins, the basis for what many analysts call "earnings leverage." In many cases, high profit margins are the result of a product with low marginal cost. Again, take Microsoft as an example. The company sells software either packaged on CDs or simply downloaded via the Internet. Microsoft spends billions of dollars developing new software; however, once those development costs are paid, the cost to produce and sell one more copy is negligible. A set of CDs containing Windows code costs less than $0.05 to produce, and offering a program for download on the Internet is close to free for Microsoft. Thus, once Microsoft sells enough of its product to cover fixed software development costs, most of its additional revenues drop straight to the bottom line. This is one key reason that Microsoft's profitability metrics are so reliably strong. One of the most common measures of profitability is operating margin. Calculated by dividing a company's operating profit by its sales revenues, operating margins are expressed in percentage terms. Microsoft's trailing operating margin stands at just under 38%. To put that into context, consider that the average operating margin for S&P 500 companies is around 15% -- a margin of 38% puts Microsoft in the top 7% of all companies in the U.S.. My decision to use Microsoft as an example of a profitable company with competitive advantages wasn't random. After all, Microsoft isn't the only software company to sport strong profit margins and a wide moat. The average operating profit margin for the Bloomberg World Software Index currently stands at nearly +20%, significantly greater than the S&P 500. Of course, that's just an average, the best in the business sport margins significantly greater. As you have learned, this metric means that software developers are particularly profitable, and thus can make prudent investments. In the table below, my staff and I list of some of the largest software firms traded in the U.S. And in the text that follows, we highlight a handful of the most promising plays in the industry. Important Note: In the remainder of this article, StreetAuthority Market Advisor editor Paul Tracy provides a table listing 15 promising software companies with operating margins as high as 42%, and he gives in-depth profiles of the two companies he likes the most. However, in order to view the remainder of this article, you'll need to subscribe to our premium investing newsletter -- Market Advisor. After you subscribe, you'll receive immediate access to this full article, as well as our monthly Market Advisor newsletter and a host of additional premium content. Please visit one of the following links to continue . . .
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||